7.
922
will an improvement in the wireless service between Canton
and Hong Kong finally kill it. Therefore, it would seem
that our best course for the present is to do nothing and
to wait for some further move either by Canton or Peking.
6.
The next day, after Mr. Brenan had returned
to Canton, I received a telegram dated the 10th April from.
Sir Miles Lampson, who had resumed duty in Peking, saying
that the Wai-chiao-pu continued to press for a reply on the
subject of the Chinese Telegraph Office in Hong Kong, and
that the Vice Minister for Foreign Affairs had raised the
matter in conversation on the 9th April. Sir Miles had
explained my attitude, namely, that i was determined to
remove this office from the sphere of Chinese political
intrigue, and that the best way to do this was either to
close the office altogether and maintain communication by
wireless, or else to hand over the office to the Eastern
Extension Telegraph Company to operate temporarily, pending
an agreement between the North and South. The Vice Minister
for Foreign Affairs agreed with him that this attitude was reasonable, but represented that the Peking authorities were much exercised over the reported handing over of the office to a canton nominee. He subsequently sent Sir Miles a private message, requesting him to telegraph to me suggesting the handing over of the office to the cable Company as a provisional compromise. Sir Miles added that he himself attached importance to adhering to the terms in
which he and I concurred, while he was in Hong Kong, for
taking action in the matter. Sir Miles has, however, overlooked the fact that my telegram of the 20th February, in the terms of which he concurred, definitely stated that i
would
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.